Advice
The Office Politics Game: Why Playing It Right Beats Pretending It Doesn't Exist
Related Reading:
Office politics gets a bad rap, and frankly, that's bollocks.
After eighteen years helping executives navigate corporate chaos across Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane, I've watched countless talented professionals shoot themselves in the foot by pretending workplace dynamics don't matter. They think they're above it all. Noble, even. What they actually are is unemployed, passed over, or stuck in the same position watching less qualified colleagues get promoted around them.
Here's what no one wants to admit: office politics isn't about being manipulative or kissing arse. It's about understanding how humans actually work together when resources, recognition, and opportunities are limited. And last time I checked, those things are always limited.
The Three Types of Office Politicians
In my experience, there are three distinct breeds of office politicians roaming Australian workplaces:
The Ostrich Brigade: These poor souls stick their heads in the sand, believing hard work alone will save them. They're usually brilliant at their jobs but wonder why they're overlooked for leadership roles. I was one of these for my first five years. Spent more time perfecting spreadsheets than building relationships. Big mistake.
The Machiavellis: They've read "The Art of War" one too many times and treat every interaction like a chess move. Exhausting to be around, but occasionally effective if you can stomach the drama. Think Gordon Gekko meets middle management.
The Navigators: These are the smart ones. They understand that influence flows through relationships, that perception often trumps reality, and that sometimes you need to play the game to change the rules.
Guess which category gets things done?
Why Australian Workplaces Are Particularly Tricky
Australian corporate culture creates unique political challenges. We've got this weird thing where we're simultaneously egalitarian ("she'll be right, mate") and hierarchical (proper chains of command matter). This creates confusion.
Add our cultural distaste for tall poppy syndrome, and you've got talented people afraid to promote their achievements whilst simultaneously having to navigate complex org charts inherited from American management consulting firms.
I once worked with a mining company in Perth where the CEO insisted on an open-door policy but made every major decision in closed-door sessions with his university mates. Classic Australian contradiction: democratic in theory, network-based in practice.
The Unspoken Rules Nobody Tells You
After watching hundreds of careers rise and fall, I've noticed patterns. Here are the political truths that HR will never put in an employee handbook:
Information is currency. Not gossip – actual useful information. Who's really making decisions? What projects have executive backing? Which budgets are secure? The person who knows these things first has options. The person who finds out last has problems.
Visibility beats perfection. I've seen brilliant analysts produce flawless reports that nobody reads, whilst mediocre managers with great presentation skills get promoted. Unfair? Absolutely. Reality? Also absolutely.
Allies matter more than achievements. Your work speaks for itself? No, it doesn't. Your work sits there silently unless someone speaks for it. And that someone needs to be in the room when decisions are made.
This isn't cynicism talking – it's pattern recognition.
The Email Game That Everyone Plays But Nobody Admits
Let's talk about email politics because this is where most people stuff things up spectacularly.
Copying the right people on emails isn't about transparency – it's about creating witnesses and applying pressure. When you CC someone's boss on a follow-up email, you're not being helpful. You're making a statement.
The timing of emails matters too. Send a brilliant proposal at 4:30 PM on Friday, and it dies in the weekend void. Send it Tuesday at 10 AM, and it gets the attention it deserves.
I learned this the hard way when I spent three weeks crafting a comprehensive workforce development strategy, sent it out during the Melbourne Cup week, and watched it disappear into the ether. Six months later, a colleague presented essentially the same ideas and got approval within a week. Better timing, better politics.
Playing Defence vs Playing Offence
Most people think office politics is about getting ahead, but honestly, half the time it's about not getting screwed over.
Defensive politics includes things like:
- Documenting decisions so they can't be changed later without your knowledge
- Building relationships across departments, not just up the hierarchy
- Understanding budget cycles and restructure timelines
- Keeping your CV updated and your network warm
Offensive politics is about:
- Positioning yourself for opportunities before they're officially announced
- Aligning your projects with executive priorities
- Building coalition support for your ideas
- Strategic volunteering for high-visibility assignments
The thing is, you need both. Pure defence makes you safe but stagnant. Pure offence makes you visible but vulnerable.
When Politics Goes Wrong (And How to Spot It)
Not all political games are worth playing. Some workplaces are genuinely toxic, and no amount of strategic thinking will fix fundamental cultural problems.
Warning signs include:
- Information hoarding that prevents people from doing their jobs
- Punitive behaviour towards those who ask questions
- Promotion decisions that make no logical sense to anyone
- Leadership that changes direction every quarter based on the latest management fad
I once consulted for a tech startup where the founders would publicly humiliate employees who disagreed with them in all-hands meetings. That's not politics – that's pathology. Sometimes the best political move is getting the hell out.
The Gender Factor Nobody Wants to Discuss
Look, we need to acknowledge that office politics hit differently depending on your gender, age, and background.
Women who play politics get labelled "aggressive" for behaviour that gets men called "strategic." Older workers find their network connections dismissed as "boys' clubs" whilst younger employees get praised for "fresh perspectives" when they suggest the same things.
The solution isn't to pretend these biases don't exist – it's to understand them and develop strategies accordingly. This might mean finding senior sponsors who can advocate for you, documenting your contributions more thoroughly than your male colleagues need to, or building cross-generational alliances.
Practical Navigation Strategies That Actually Work
Here's what I tell clients who want to get better at workplace dynamics without becoming corporate sociopaths:
Start with relationship mapping. Draw up your organisation chart, but instead of reporting lines, map influence lines. Who really makes decisions? Who has the CEO's ear? Where are the informal power centres? This isn't gossip – it's reconnaissance.
Invest in bridges, not just ladders. Most people focus on managing up, but relationships with peers and even junior colleagues often matter more long-term. Today's graduate analyst could be tomorrow's department head.
Timing is everything. Propose budget increases right after good quarterly results. Suggest efficiency improvements during cost-cutting cycles. Present innovation ideas when leadership is focused on growth. Work with the organisational rhythm, not against it.
Master the follow-up. Most brilliant ideas die not because they're bad, but because they're forgotten. Great politicians are relentless but polite about following up on commitments, decisions, and next steps.
The Technology Twist
Modern workplaces have added digital layers to traditional office politics. Slack channels create new inclusion/exclusion dynamics. Zoom meetings enable new forms of grandstanding and backgrounding. LinkedIn has become a weird hybrid of networking and performance art.
I've watched senior executives lose influence because they couldn't adapt to digital communication styles, and junior employees gain access to senior leadership through strategic use of internal collaboration tools.
The fundamentals remain the same – it's still about relationships, information, and influence – but the mechanisms have evolved.
Why This Matters More Than Ever
Remote and hybrid work has made office politics more important, not less. When you're not sharing coffee machine conversations or impromptu corridor catch-ups, every interaction becomes more deliberate.
The informal networks that used to develop naturally now require intentional cultivation. Information doesn't flow as freely, which means the people who actively maintain connections have significant advantages.
Plus, with faster business cycles and more frequent restructures, the ability to read organisational tea leaves and position yourself accordingly has become a survival skill, not just a career advancement strategy.
The Bottom Line
Office politics isn't going anywhere because human nature isn't going anywhere. You can choose to understand how power, influence, and decision-making actually work in your organisation, or you can pretend it's all about merit and wonder why your career plateaus while less qualified people advance around you.
The choice is yours, but don't kid yourself about what choice you're actually making.
Our Favourite Resources: